PDF in Sweden BRÅDSKANDE UPPMANING
PDF in Finish UKIIREELLINEN VETOOMUS
PDF in Sweden BRÅDSKANDE UPPMANING
PDF in Finish UKIIREELLINEN VETOOMUS
European Lawyers declare: Remove PKK from the EU Terror List – lift the activity ban – support the peace process – legal reassessment necessary ELDH Berlin / Düsseldorf / London, 29 October 2014
PKK ban for more than 20 years
Since 2002 on request of the –Turkish Government the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) has been listed as a terrorist Organisation by the Council of the European Union. This list is updated regularly. The main reasons have been the acts of violence in Turkey and abroad. Within the European Union Germany has played a vanguard role in criminalizing the PKK. For over 20 years the PKK and associated organisations have been banned from political activities. The PKK as an organisation is prosecuted in Germany as foreign terrorist organisation (§129b StGB, German Criminal Law). Every support for the PKK, in its widest sense, is also prosecuted.
As a result of such a policy thousands of Kurds in Turkey and the member states of the EU have been prosecuted. Associated organisations or political parties and Kurdish Newspapers have been banned, TV stations are closed. The rights of countless Kurds and political supporters to freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press have been violated by these measures. Provisions of the law concerning aliens, up to provisions on deportation of aliens, have been used. The banning of the PKK not only puts into question the right of residence of ten thousands of Kurds. but it also leads to their criminalisation.
Democratic and progressive lawyers all over the world have repeatedly protested against the criminalization of so many Kurds and have demanded the removal of the PKK from the list of terrorist organisations of the European Union and the lifting of the ban on political activities The PKK itself has made several attempts – of which only some were successful – to appeal against prosecutions, which they considered to be unlawful, in Germany and other European countries. One of the most recent, dated 2nd May 2014, was the legal action at the Court of the European Union, on behalf of the Executive Committee of PKK, taken against the Council of the European Union. Its objective was to remove the PKK from the EU list of terrorist organisations.
Furthermore the list of terrorist organisation has met with general legal concerns, amongst others from the former President of the German Constitutional Court, Hans-Jürgen Papier, and from the former Special Rapporteur of the Council of Europe, Dick Marty. Those who are listed are hit by travel and financial restrictions. For the concerned person or organisation the listing results in the freezing of all bank accounts. At the same time no financial or other economic resources may be granted to the listed person or organisation.
The listing takes place in a non-transparent procedure which does not allow the persons or organizations concerned appropriate legal means of defence, such as inspection of files or the right to be heard. Terrorist listing has not succeeded in achieving any significant reduction of terrorism and may therefore be considered to be unreasonable and inefficient.
The legal validity of banning decisions by the administration in Germany or other countries, even as far as these have been confirmed by court decisions, cannot justify an unlimited stigmatisation of a political organisation. When the concrete circumstances, on which they were based, are no longer valid, these decisions have to be annulled. The severe violations of fundamental rights caused by banning decisions have to be re-examined regularly, to make sure they are still justified.
Legal reassessment necessary
High ranking politicians of the governing coalition in Germany as well of the opposition parties have to acknowledge that certain promising results in the battle against the advance of the so called “Islamic State” (IS) in Iraq and in the self-governed Region in Western Kurdistan/Northern Syria (Rojava), are the result of the unprecedented and courageous battle of the PKK and its allied forces. Fewer politicians than ever are maintaining their old stereotypes when assessing PKK.
The necessary conclusions should be drawn from the transition from civil war to peaceful living together by way of examples such as Northern Ireland or South Africa.
The following circumstances demand a legal reassessment of PKK by the German government, by the governments of other European countries, as well as by the European Union:
Demands to the European Governments
The supporters of this appeal demand from the German Government as well as from the governments of the member states of the European Union and other European governments active support for the peace process in Turkey and in this context in particular:
Demands to the European Union
The supporters of this appeal demand as well from the European Union the active support of the peace process in Turkey and in this context in particular:
The supporters of this appeal demand from the Turkish Government
ELDH European Association of Lawyers for Democracy & World Human Rights
President: Professor Bill Bowring, London | E-Mail: email@example.com | Phone +44 (0)781 048 34 39 Présidente d’honneur: Professeure Monique Chemillier-Gendreau, Paris
Secretary General: Rechtsanwalt Thomas Schmidt, Düsseldorf| E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org | Phone +49 (0)172 68 10 888
Postal address: ELDH | Thomas Schmidt | Platanenstrasse 13 | D – 40233 Düsseldorf (Germany) Website: www.eldh.eu
Prepared by Stephen Knight, I Pump Court Chambers Instructed by Paul Heron and Helen Mowatt, Public Interest Law Centre – 13 November 2019
Summary of Advice
The Court of Appeal of Brussel once again pointed out that the activities of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) are not terrorist, and rejected trying 37 Kurdish politicians.
The Belgian Court of Cassation has ruled that the activities of PKK which is leading an armed struggle against the Turkish state which denies the rights of the Kurds are non-terrorist, and rejected the trial of 37 Kurdish politicians; the co-chair of the People’s Assembly Remzi Kartal, the member of Kurdistan Community Union’s Coordination Zubeyir Aydar.
With this decision, the investigation of the federal judiciary in Belgium which has begun since 2006 towards PKK leaders ended, keeping only one right for the federal judiciary, namely reviewing the Belgian Supreme Court.
A Westminster Hall debate on Kurdish political representation and equality in Turkey has been scheduled for Tuesday 2 November 2021, from 9.30-11:00am. The debate has been initiated by Lloyd Russell-Moyle MP. 28 October 2021 House of Commons 20021
Kurdish Political representation
Kurds in Turkey are diverse in terms of political affiliation, language and cultural and religious identity. Of current political parties in Turkey that are perceived as predominantly Kurdish, the largest is the People’s Democratic Party (HDP) and its affiliate the Democratic Regions Party (DBP), which competes only in local elections. The HDP is often described as “left wing”, and the HDP and DBP are widely seen as influenced to some degree by the anti-capitalist ideology of Abdullah Öcalan, the founder of the principal Kurdish armed insurgent group in Turkey, the PKK. House of Commons 20021